Skip Navigation


Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2006
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2007 2(1):12-19; doi:10.1093/scan/nsl041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/12    most recent
nsl041v2
nsl041v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wraga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wraga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women's mental rotation performance

Maryjane Wraga1, Molly Helt1, Emily Jacobs2 and Kerry Sullivan1

1Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA and 2Department of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA

Recent negative focus on women's academic abilities has fueled disputes over gender disparities in the sciences. The controversy derives, in part, from women's relatively poorer performance in aptitude tests, many of which require skills of spatial reasoning. We used functional magnetic imaging to examine the neural structure underlying shifts in women's performance of a spatial reasoning task induced by positive and negative stereotypes. Three groups of participants performed a task involving imagined rotations of the self. Prior to scanning, the positive stereotype group was exposed to a false but plausible stereotype of women's superior perspective-taking abilities; the negative stereotype group was exposed to the pervasive stereotype that men outperform women on spatial tasks; and the control group received neutral information. The significantly poorer performance we found in the negative stereotype group corresponded to increased activation in brain regions associated with increased emotional load. In contrast, the significantly improved performance we found in the positive stereotype group was associated with increased activation in visual processing areas and, to a lesser degree, complex working memory processes. These findings suggest that stereotype messages affect the brain selectively, with positive messages producing relatively more efficient neural strategies than negative messages.

Keywords: stereotype threat; fMRI; mental rotation; intellectual performance; spatial cognition



Correspondence should be addressed to Maryjane Wraga, Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA. E-mail: mwraga{at}smith.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
B. Derks, M. Inzlicht, and S. Kang
The Neuroscience of Stigma and Stereotype Threat
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 163 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.