Skip Navigation

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2006 1(1):56-64; doi:10.1093/scan/nsl004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Dissociating medial frontal and posterior cingulate activity during self-reflection

Marcia K. Johnson, Carol L. Raye, Karen J. Mitchell, Sharon R. Touryan, Erich J. Greene and Susan Nolen-Hoeksema

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

Motivationally significant agendas guide perception, thought and behaviour, helping one to define a ‘self’ and to regulate interactions with the environment. To investigate neural correlates of thinking about such agendas, we asked participants to think about their hopes and aspirations (promotion focus) or their duties and obligations (prevention focus) during functional magnetic resonance imaging and compared these self-reflection conditions with a distraction condition in which participants thought about non-self-relevant items. Self-reflection resulted in greater activity than distraction in dorsomedial frontal/anterior cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, consistent with previous findings of activity in these areas during self-relevant thought. For additional medial areas, we report new evidence of a double dissociation of function between medial prefrontal/anterior cingulate cortex, which showed relatively greater activity to thinking about hopes and aspirations, and posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, which showed relatively greater activity to thinking about duties and obligations. One possibility is that activity in medial prefrontal cortex is associated with instrumental or agentic self-reflection, whereas posterior medial cortex is associated with experiential self-reflection. Another, not necessarily mutually exclusive, possibility is that medial prefrontal cortex is associated with a more inward-directed focus, while posterior cingulate is associated with a more outward-directed, social or contextual focus.

Keywords: self-reflection; medial frontal cortex; posterior cingulate cortex; precuneus; regulatory focus; rumination



Correspondence should be addressed to Marcia K. Johnson, Department of Psychology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA. E-mail: marcia.johnson{at}yale.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. F. Dovidio, A. R. Pearson, and P. Orr
Social Psychology and Neuroscience: Strange Bedfellows or a Healthy Marriage?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 247 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
N. A. S. Farb, Z. V. Segal, H. Mayberg, J. Bean, D. McKeon, Z. Fatima, and A. K. Anderson
Attending to the present: mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, December 1, 2007; 2(4): 313 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.