Skip Navigation


Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2009
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2009 4(2):111-118; doi:10.1093/scan/nsn043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/2/111    most recent
nsn043v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shane, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kiehl, K. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shane, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kiehl, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Double dissociation between perspective-taking and empathic-concern as predictors of hemodynamic response to another's mistakes

Matthew S. Shane1, Michael C. Stevens2, Carla L. Harenski1 and Kent A. Kiehl1,3

1The Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM, 2Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, and 3Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Identifying another's mistakes requires a basic representation of other's action patterns as well as recognition and understanding of their failed goal-attainment. In previous work, we identified several regions, including inferior parietal cortex and rostral/ventral anterior cinguli (r/vACC), that show unique sensitivity to the observation of another's errors. Here we utilize the same sample to show that participants’ level of self-reported perspective-taking (but not empathic concern) correlated with hemodynamic response in IPC, while participants’ level of self-reported empathic concern (but not perspective taking) correlated with hemodynamic response in r/vACC. This functional dissociation provides strong evidence for separate roles for IPC and r/vACC in the processing of observed errors. IPC may foster a sense of agency by distinguishing self- from other-performed actions; r/vACC may, in turn, promote a more contextually-mediated understanding of the other's failed goal-attainment.

Keywords: empathy; perspective-taking; error-monitoring; cingulate; inferior parietal cortex; fMRI

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Matthew S. Shane, PhD, The Mind Research Network,1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA. E-mail: mshane{at}mrn.org

Received July 21, 2008. Accepted October 25, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.