Skip Navigation



Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance Access published online on March 6, 2009

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, doi:10.1093/scan/nsp004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/2/191    most recent
nsp004v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Corral, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Corral, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component

Katherine R. White, Stephen L. Crites, Jr, Jennifer H. Taylor and Guadalupe Corral

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

Numerous discoveries regarding stereotypes have been uncovered by utilizing techniques and methods developed by cognitive psychologists. The present study continues this tradition by borrowing psychophysiological techniques used for the study of memory and language, and applying them to the study of stereotypes. In this study, participants were primed with either the gender category ‘Women’ or ‘Men’, followed by a word which was either consistent with gender stereotypes (e.g. Women: Nurturing) or inconsistent (e.g. Women: Aggressive). Their task was to indicate whether the words matched or did not match, according to gender stereotypes. Both response times and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during performance of the task. As predicted, stereotype incongruent word pairs were associated with larger N400 ERP amplitudes and slower response times, relative to congruent word pairs. The potential utility of this approach as an independent measure of stereotypes is discussed.

Keywords: ERPs; N400; stereotypes; social cognition; gender



Correspondence should be addressed to Katherine R. White, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. Email: krwhite{at}miners.utep.edu

Received August 25, 2008. Accepted January 22, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.